Some Basics of Lighting on a Budget

As stated in the last entry, I spent the majority of my yesterday watching how-to videos mostly regarding lighting.

Two years ago, I bought a professional light kit. Cheap, around $300 (later in this entry: you can recreate a similar set for $75)-- nothing too fancy. I was excited to use them professionally, I set them up for a few shots around the house but didn't have anything too interesting to point them at. My job as a professional photographer was shooting live concerts, never giving me a chance to use the lights. The first photo shoot I took on my own time after buying the lights was of a girl outside of a couple of churches in Manhattan ('Sunday Allure', for those interested in visiting my website). These shots were all done outside with natural light, so my lights again sat at home. I then found a great deal on a Sony TVR9000, so I rushed to buy it. It's my first pro-sumer mini DV camera, so I then put my photo camera aside as I was well versed in that (sans artificial lighting), to make time to learn the ins and outs of my new DV camera. That was about a year and a half ago, and I've spent most of this time shooting with that, fiddling with editing, and almost all of the shooting I've done has been outdoors. I've shot a few indoor sets of professional quality photos in this time. One was emulating amateur photography from the 40's, so I set the lights up to look like amateur aged lighting. Purposely blowing things out and going for sharp shadows. I learned a lot from doing this, it looked smooth and true to the era, but I wasn't confident that I would be able to achieve that smooth look with a more modern style. The next set of professional quality photos I took were of a set I built in my house, against a black backdrop with dead pieces of trees coming in from out of frame. I set up two lights, and things looked good; I didn't know about techniques in lighting -- but I did know that the photos were exposed very nicely with deep blacks and bright whites. The shots came out very smooth and nicely lit; I still stand by this, even after what I've learned yesterday.

However, I now know how much more I can achieve with lighting. Even with the cheap set I bought two years ago that I've barely gotten to experiment with. I knew how to light a green screen, I knew how to light a subject, I knew how to work with outdoor light, but what I didn't know was how to do all of this stylistically. Learning about a new topic in film making is like gaining a new sense. I can now look back at my work and see things that just weren't there before. The first photo I ever took with my new lights is this one:



I haven't paid much attention to that photo in a few months. Tonight I'm looking at it and I'm saying "that's a very nice photograph, though it's overexposed."

Alright, so how do we light? More importantly, how do we light on a budget?
Two nights ago I found a forum called DVX User, in which there was a thread entitled Lighting for beginners! Tutorials/links collection. These links kept me busy all day, I woke up in the morning without understanding the goals or principles to lighting, and I went to bed that night with a much better understanding on how to light different subjects and why.
The first link in this thread is by a cinematographer named Scott Spears, and has 8 videos on the subject of lighting, among other things.

I highly suggest that anyone looking for information on lighting check out all 8 videos, but this is what I took from it:

China Lamps create a nice soft light that are good for closeups. I can vouch for this because I worked as an extra on a professional film set last month, and for the 2 day duration in which I was there, the 2 principle actors were lit using a china lamp that was taped to the ceiling, roughly about a foot above their heads. If an $8 light is good enough for a professional crew, it's great for me. Clothespins are perfect for clipping reflectors and flags to stands, furniture, etc. This is rather obvious, yes, but I was recently at a dollar store that had the professional looking C clamps at 3 for $1. I thought this was a good deal and considered picking up a couple. I didn't get around to that, and I'm glad that I didn't because I didn't even consider clothes pins. It's so obvious but so genius, at 50 for $1 you can't go wrong. Be sure to get wooden clips, as plastic ones can melt if you plan on using them around lights.

The idea of a hand dimmer excites me; you can plug any light into it and it has a switch that can dim said light. I thought that lights with basic on/off switches were reduced to measures like distance and reflectors if you needed to bring it down any. This hand dimmer idea definitely solves some of my misconceptions surrounding lighting. A professional light that I want to look into buying is a 1k nook light, which I believe the video said runs for around $15. The light has barn doors (though not the one pictured below), which is good for shaping the light; but the light is quite strong (1,000 watts) so the idea is to diffuse it by pointing it at a reflector (which can be made cheaply by attaching crumbled aluminum foil to a large sheet of cardboard), or perhaps the ceiling (the example given in the video) to give a wide diffused light for your key.



I apologize for how some of this is slightly unorganized. I'm writing all of it from memory because it wasn't until the end of my day that I decided to start a blog about it. Had I of known about the blog going in, I would have been taking notes the entire time. Now I know.

Moving on, the second link in the thread is Joren Clark Lighting, which mentions one of the most interesting use of lights I've seen. Here's a direct quote:

"White Christmas Lights. This is my secret weapon. I use these as practical sources in almost every night exterior scene. They make night scenes look more interesting. Hang them on a railing, in a tree, or around any post or beam to add an accent to the picture. Also, they do provide a good amount of light in larger quantities. I once made “light boards” out of hundreds of Christmas lights and two-foot square pieces of cardboard lined with aluminum foil. …it was ridiculously labor intensive so I don’t recommend it, but it worked well. The unfortunate thing about Christmas lights is they will never white balance, as they’re too warm."

I always have trouble lighting night scenes, as I don't even know how to begin without access to a power outlet. I once borrowed a battery operated floodlight from a friend of mine in hopes of lighting a night shot, but the battery depleted faster than I was shooting, and even when it did work it was an ugly orange spotlight. There are workarounds for this, but not when your light has about 20 minutes of battery power.

An innovative idea that I got from the first link, is the use of something like this for external night shots:



This screws into a light socket, converting it into a power outlet. I live in a city, which means lots and lots of lights at night; and the residential areas have buildings and private houses that usually have bulbs outside the entrance ways that are powered with a conventional light socket. I'm not a fan of 'stealing' things, but when it comes to film I don't mind borrowing resources here and there. This tool makes it a possibility to borrow power for your lights during a night shot, and with a couple of 50ft or so extension cords you could do it in confidence. To prove how much I love this idea, the picture above is of my adapter, as I went out and bought one immediately after learning of it.

This is not always a feasible option of course, so I'd like to know how some of you light your night shots. Whether it cost you $5000 or $5, I'm looking for examples on how others have done it. I shot an entire piece one night and thought it looked fine through the viewfinder, only to get home and see that it was completely unusable and grainy. There are filters like NeatVideo to reduce grain, but it also reduces focus. I've yet to re-shoot it because I've yet to find an affordable solution. The light bulb tap won't work in this case as the piece is shot on a beach.

[I'm off topic here, but I just put on an old episode of Loveline, and Adam Carolla is complaining about how long it takes people to light movies.]

Back on topic, the third link points to an article at Shutter Talk, which will show you how to make a decent light kit for around $75. The highlight for me in this article is the mention of using an IKEA clothes rack to hang devices off of.



The article suggests using this rack for hanging sheets off of as a diffuser, but furthermore you can use this to attach reflectors, and I assume that if you lay weights down on the base of this thing you can attach lights to it. It seems to be a very diverse item, and for an MSRP of $7.50 it's probably worth it to pick a few up.

The article also goes into the differences between normal tungsten halogen light and "Ultra White" tungsten halogen lights. Times that I've shot at home, I've always been confused and disappointed as to why my lights come off as orange, even when correctly white balanced. The article explains:

"There is one big problem with these lights, however -- they are halogen tungsten lights. The light they throw is very yellow and usually not desirable for colour photography. If you shoot in Black and White then you can get away with it, but if you shoot colour and especially if you want to mix this light with other light sources such as daylight or flash, then we need to do something about it.

Luckily the solution is just as easy. There are replacement globes available for these lights that are tinted blue to cancel out the warm colour temperature of the light. See the end of this article for some comparison photos of the same scene under different light sources shot with identical white balance settings."

The fourth article, The Complete Eejit's guide To Film-Making", teaches the procedure of three point lighting. This is something that I've always heard about but somehow unintentionally avoided learning. Seeing how it's done now, I realize just how important of a guideline it is, as it adds dimension to a two dimensional medium. As stated, I didn't understand the principles of lighting; so I didn't know this measure in making a subject pop from it's surrounding.

This is a diagram of the basic three light setup:



As the article states:
"Set something up you want to light. The example that is always used is a person. Set up your first [light] and put it in front of the subject at a 45o angle looking down on them a little. This is the key light...

But the subject does seem to have heavy shadows on the opposite side of their face. Erect another [light] making this one more diffuse by reflecting it off a wall, a reflector or by putting a scrim (basically a grille) in front of it. This is the fill light and helps soften the shadows.

You can also add a light above and behind the subject to add a slight corona (ie. white line) around them that helps to separate them from the background. This is called the back light."

To see more options for three point lighting as far as softboxes (a shade used to soften a light), umbrellas (used to reflect light), and light placement goes, visit the links below.
http://schooltorque.com/lighting_lesson.htm
http://www.utexas.edu/web/video/prod.php?e=0#lights
http://coe.sdsu.edu/eet/articles/lighting/start.htm

Something that I didn't see any of the above articles mention is the usage of a catch light. From Wikipedia:
"The term catch light is used to describe either the specular highlight in a subject's eye from a light source, or the light source itself."
In other words, a catch light adds a 'sparkle' to a subject's eye. This can be achieved through a number of ways, by changing the angle of your key light to using a ring light.

I'm currently in the process of writing a script, and I've been thinking of methods of how to light a certain character who I want to have a constant look of dismay. I considered lighting him with a harsher light than the other characters, not filling out the shadows, but now I'm considering just making sure not to use a catch light on him. I've yet to experiment with this, but it's definitely an idea.

Moving on, I spent 5 hours of my time on Izzy Digital Video Podcast Tutorials. Izzy Video, hosted by Israel Hymen is an (as of this writing) 52 episode series teaching tons of tricks and procedures for shooting digital. I regret not taking notes while watching this series, as I believe I've learned more about film making during those five hours than I've learned in weeks. The episodes are approximately 5 minutes each, which makes it easier to watch in multiple sittings. Should you not be able to find the time to watch this series, I encourage you to flip through the link above, and watch the episodes that are about topics you'd like to learn or brush up on.

This video series taught me about some of the settings that my camera had that I wasn't even aware of. One video discusses how to emulate a shallow depth of field (emulate, not create), by pulling your camera back a distance and zooming in on your subject. What this does is blur the background while keeping the subject in focus, which is similar to what film does. I liked the effect that this gives, but accepted the fact that I won't be able to do it as my camera has a digital zoom, not optical, which means that when I zoom, the quality of the picture will degrade. Later that night I was looking at some settings in the menu, and found the option of turning the "D ZOOM" off. I turned this off to discover that my camera still zooms, but not as deep. For those of you that know more about zoom, did I turn off the Digital Zoom, which means that the camera has a built in optical zoom, or does "D ZOOM" stand for something like "deep zoom," in which case I still can't use this depth of field trick without buying an optical zoom lens?



Another thing that the Izzy Video series touches on is the use of a "Neutral Density Filter," which allows you to use a wide open aperture while filming on a sunny day. I've read online about being able to use pantyhose to achieve a similar effect, which is what I planned on doing; until I noticed this:



I realize that Neutral Density Filters come in different intensities, but I've gotten the chance to test mine and can say that it does seem to diffuse glare and give a much softer image. Not all cameras will have this setting, so I suggest watching the Izzy episode on this, and should you decide to use one you could find them on eBay, or as mentioned, slide pantyhose over your lens.

These have been some of the highlights of what the links taught me yesterday. As for today: I've learned to take notes for my next entries.

Also, should any of you find a deal on a "Sennheiser ME66" shotgun microphone, please let me know. I hope to discuss this mic, the basics of recording sound, and how to make a working shock mount for under $10 in my next entry.

Thank you very much for reading, please consider leaving a comment.
This is my first informative entry and I would like to know if I have any readers. Anonymous comments are enabled.

Please share any tips you may have on lighting on a budget